[OAI-implementers] OAI-PMH baseURL discovery
Tansley, Robert
robert.tansley at hp.com
Fri Feb 18 09:04:24 EST 2005
Lots of news sites use <link> to inform browsers etc. of an RSS feed,
e.g. news.bbc.co.uk, slashdot.org, theregister.co.uk, and the
Mozilla/Firefox browsers use this to allow 'live bookmarks'. I'm sure
other tools use them too.
E.g. <link
href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/rss/newsonline_world_edition/front_page/rss0
91.xml" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="rss" />
This established practice seems pretty consistent with what we're trying
to do. I could easily envisage an OAI-PMH Firefox extension that does
something with this...
Robert Tansley / Digital Media Systems Programme / HP Labs
http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Robert_Tansley/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oai-implementers-bounces at openarchives.org
> [mailto:oai-implementers-bounces at openarchives.org] On Behalf
> Of Andy Powell
> Sent: 14 February 2005 15:48
> To: Michael Nelson
> Cc: OAI Implementors
> Subject: Re: [OAI-implementers] OAI-PMH baseURL discovery
>
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Michael Nelson wrote:
>
> > > I disagree with your implied preference for using <meta>
> rather than
> > > <link>. In this case, we clearly want to provide a link
> to another
> > > resource - therefore the semantics of the <link> tag are much more
> > > appropriate than the semantics of the <meta> tag.
> > >
> > > I also suspect that your suggested use of
> > >
> > > OAIPMHbaseURL="..."
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > OAIPMHrecord="..."
> > >
> > > break the (X)HTML specs (though I haven't checked)?
> >
> > you are correct -- they do.
> >
> > re: meta vs. link... We don't have a strong opinion either
> way, but I did
> > see this:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml2-20040722/mod-meta.html#sec_20.5.
> >
> > "This element defines a link. Link conveys relationship
> information that
> > may be rendered by user agents in a variety of ways (e.g.,
> a tool-bar with
> > a drop-down menu of links)."
> >
> > I know <link> is not in common use, but it appears like the
> intention is
> > to promote it to interactive user status? If so, wouldn't
> that be the
> > wrong thing to do with a (for example) GetRecord request?
>
> Possibly, though I note that the same document also says this
> in section
> 20.2.2
>
> Note that just because we are using URIs as unique
> identifiers doesn't
> mean that navigating to this URI with a web browser would
> yield anything
> useful.
>
> which doesn't seem entirely compatible with the section you
> quote from!
>
> Remember that this document is about XHTML 2.0, which is not
> finalised.
>
> On the other hand, section 5.19 of
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/
>
> (which I think is the appropriate W3C recommendation) says
>
> The Link Module defines an element that can be used to
> define links to
> external resources. These resources are often used to
> augment the user
> agent's ability to process the associated XHTML document.
>
> which doesn't (to me) imply that the browser should
> necessarily expect to
> display the <link> to the end user (i.e. "augment" could mean other
> things). In our case, the 'user agent' is a Web robot, which is being
> 'augmented in its ability to process the document' by being
> pointed to the
> OAI repository (or specific OAI record) associated with the page.
>
> Having said that, I know that some browsers do display all
> <link> tags to
> the end-user in some form (e.g. Lynx and Opera I think). This has
> resulted in a couple of negative comments about one of the DCMI
> recommendations ("Encoding DC metadata in (X)HTML meta and link
> elements"). Dublin Core recommends using a <link> tag to provide the
> namespace URI associated with the "DC." prefix used in <meta>
> tags like
>
> <meta name="DC.title" content="blah" />
>
> and I know that a couple of people have complained that their browsers
> show them the namespace URI as though it is a clickable link :-(
>
> All in all I'm not sure what is best. I think that the semantics of
> <link> are appropriate, but given some browser behaviour it
> may be more
> sensible to use <meta>.
>
> Andy
> --
> Distributed Systems, UKOLN, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
> http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/a.powell/ +44 1225 383933
> Resource Discovery Network http://www.rdn.ac.uk/
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAI-implementers mailing list
> List information, archives, preferences and to unsubscribe:
> http://www.openarchives.org/mailman/listinfo/oai-implementers
>
>
More information about the OAI-implementers
mailing list